Income document integrity

A review record for the numbers behind a paystub.

ImgFact checks paystub arithmetic, dates, year-to-date movement, and visible inconsistencies. Every finding shows its evidence and uncertainty so a person—not a black box—makes the decision.

Built for property managers, screening teams, lenders, attorneys, and investigators. Not an automatic fraud or eligibility decision.

Four layers of review

Explain the issue. Preserve the evidence.

Each result separates observed facts from interpretation, records the original file hash, and gives the reviewer a clear place to document a disposition.

01

Document math

Recalculate gross pay, deductions, taxes, and net pay instead of trusting printed totals.

02

Period consistency

Compare pay dates, pay periods, earnings rates, and year-to-date changes across documents.

03

Visible integrity

Flag layout, typography, and content inconsistencies for human review without claiming automatic fraud detection.

04

Evidence record

Preserve file hashes, findings, timestamps, and reviewer decisions in an exportable record.

Reviewer workflow

From upload to a documented decision.

  1. UploadAdd one or more pay-period documents to a protected workspace.
  2. RecalculateImgFact extracts printed values and checks their relationships.
  3. CompareCross-period changes reveal inconsistent dates, rates, and YTD movement.
  4. ReviewA person confirms, dismisses, or escalates each evidence-linked finding.
  5. ExportShare a record with hashes, timestamps, methodology, and reviewer disposition.
!
Decision boundary

Integrity review is not identity verification, employment verification, or a fraud verdict.

ImgFact identifies inconsistencies that deserve human review. Teams remain responsible for lawful notices, adverse-action procedures, and the final decision.

Design-partner pilot

Bring us the hard document set.

We are inviting a small group of property-management and screening teams to test the workflow with synthetic or properly anonymized examples.